Going Green

There is a movement in America that is as radical as any that we have ever witnessed, it is called the Green Movement. The radical agenda of this movement is deceptive, totalitarian, anti-scientific, repressive and hypocritical. You would think that something so outrageous would be on the tips of everyones tongue, that it would be the leading topic on message boards and plastered all over the t.v. screens. Instead, few are even aware of what is going on.

With the recent election of President Barack Obama, the Green movement went from infancy to adolescence, and if elected to a second term it will reach adult stage by 2016. It would be unfair however, to blame the president on this movement, he only deserves credit for allowing it to accelerate at such a rapid rate.

What is the Green Movement? The Green Movement consists of environmentalist, progressives and utopian architects that believe that the only answer to global problems is unity through conservation. On the surface, unity and conservation do not seem to be bad words, however when one looks behind the curtain you will see that there is more to this movement than unity and conservation.

The Green Movement has done an excellent job of putting a warm and fuzzy face on there agenda, which includes regulating your behavior, downsizing your lifestyle and becoming intimately involved in the personal aspects of your everyday life. The Green Movement is an ever reaching agenda to impose "Earth Worship," on the citizens of the world. Some might think that this statement is absurd and far reaching, however, in order to establish exactly what the progressives want, this will become necessary.

Presently, the United States of America is a country that is moving closer and closer to an authoritiarian government. In Fascist Italy and Germany both governments needed a crisis or a series of crises in order to impose their totalitarian state. The Treaty of Versailles and the Great Depression provided Nazi Germany with the crisis necessary to bring about totalitarian rule. The citizens were then indoctrinated and led into the practice of "state worship." In Italy, Benito Mussolini was a charismatic leader that utilized a series of events to impose his will upon the people. The people in both incidents believed that they were doing what was best for their country. It is interesting to note that while under the dictatorial rule of Hitler and Mussolini, the concept of right and wrong was determined by whether or not something benefitted the country or state. In other words, anything that was said to benefit the state was always considered good, any opposition to that which was "in the best interest" of the state was BAD. This therefore, limited free speech and cultivated a society of so called "unity."

Today the progressives and environmentalist are quick to denounce any dissenting opinion as "right wing," bigotted, hateful, ignorant and radical. Ironically enough, the same group that once protested and rioted in the 60's for free speech, free love and etc, are now trying to silence any opposition to "their opinions." This is very hypocritical, but if you will notice it is very much like the leadership in Italy and Germany prior to and during WWII. Silence all opposition, there is only one truth and that is what is best for the state, today it could be said whatever is best for "mother earth."

I do think that it is important to note, that when I refer to modern progressives as resembling Italian and German Fascist, that this does not mean that they are preparing concentration camps as we speak. In fact, the Green Movement has done an excellent job of putting a little smiley face on their brand of Fascism and it does not appear to be heading in the same direction as Nazi Fascism, ........but it is still Fascism. All too often when we hear the word Fascism, the first thing that we think of is the Nazi Brand of Fascism, as corny as it might sound Hitler really gave Fascism a bad name, by making this statement, I am in no way saying that Fascism was a good thing either.

The Green Movement, however, is not the ends to which the progressives are headed. In fact, it is only the means, or properly spoken, the crisis needed to obtain the end desired. The end desired is authoritarian rule. By collectively "uniting" Americans under the cause of saving the planet, they will eventually create a society in which George Orwell would be proud of, but it is important to note that the first element of society that must be convinced is the youth.

In Italy and in Germany the youth movement was essential to bringing about the revolution of statist ideology. In America the indoctrination of the youth concerning Global Warming and the Green Movement has already began. Through high school curriculums, Earth Day celebrations and now the implementation of the G.I.V.E. Act millions of American youth will be exposed to the Green indoctrination and will readily swallow anything that the progressives feed them in the future, all in the name of saving the planet!

Once this ideology becomes a part of our cultural fabric, progressives will more easily be able to convince the populace that certain measures need to be taken in order to prevent our "impending doom." Strange enough the very progressives that claimed that the spend crazy Bush administration used fear as a tool to convince Americans to vote Republican are now implementing the same methodology to win support around the country and that methodology is FEAR.

Finally, one of the most overlooked and disturbing effects of the Green Movement will be the eradication and or the overpricing of products that have become a necessity for healthy living. With these items no longer available "because they are destroying the planet," the standard of human life will decrease as will the overall population of the planet. In essence, climate control equals population control.

Authors note:

1. In order for "Green Religion" to take place much like "state worship" did in Italy and Germany it must first replace the religion of the day, in the case of America it would be Christianity.

2. The word progressive as used in this article does not refer to Democrats alone, on the contrary it includes Republicans as well. As I have pointed out in previous blogs, both left and right are LEFT. Naturally speaking there are some in both parties that are not progressive and are opposed to such radical changes.

3. It is also important to note that all progressive president were NOT democrats, take Teddy Roosevelt for example.